In case you weren't in attendance at DMAI's annual July conference in Las Vegas, here are highlights of my presentation, which will also be archived on my website for future industry reference at: WWW.MMTourismMarketing.com.
Getting started with an action plan
As you would suspect, the one constant that's implicit in this issue, regardless of the size of the CVB, is the need for additional funding. And in most cases, it takes a new Action Plan to make that happen.
Some of the most effective CVB funding action plans have garnered truly great success, producing funding increases in the 40% to 400% annual range. And while we all recognize that CVBs and destination challenges are never the same, I've outlined below some of the most important issues and resulting tactics that brought about this success.
In this brief article, we have focused on the transient occupancy tax (TOT) as the principal funding source, but these six key program requirements may also be applied to other funding requirements, including voluntary assessments, BID programs, etc.
1. First, Protect Your Existing Funding
Before we get started on the Action Plan, let's address the ongoing threat to the traditional number one resource for CVBs, the dedicated transient occupancy tax that fuels nearly 90% of today's bureaus. And make no mistake; it's the CVBs role to proactively protect it. That's because today, only about 55% of the local transient occupancy tax on average is being earmarked for CVBs.
Unfortunately, a lot of this money goes to non-tourist related local uses, which is challenging as well as dangerously counter-productive, according to a national study from the Hotel & Lodging Educational Foundation. This study concludes that increases in the hotel tax, for non-CVB marketing, (city general fund, arts council operating expenses, heritage preservation, beach and waterfront development, sports facilities, arenas, etc.) can actually cause reductions in local tourism business through the reduced room sales and associated visitor spending that then negatively impacts every sector of the local economy—a 2% increase in national taxes on visitors would reduce an estimated 300,000 jobs and billions of dollars in unrealized visitor spending.
Our recommendation is to become familiar with this study and then disseminate it as required to protect the integrity of this important marketing resource for your CVB and the community you serve. You can get a copy of the study from the American Hotel and Lodging Foundation.
2. Support your New Funding Need through research
Your first Action Plan step is developing a persuasive argument for new funding through research:
- Compare your budget to other successful competitors as well as show your annual diminished budget if their annual growth rates and percentage of TOT allocation are higher. And if your organization is less than the size of the average CVB in both funding and staffing, state that as well. (The DMAI CVB Organizational and Financial Profile is an important resource to use). Also compare yourself to other more successful destinations based on competitive sets (convention center size, rooms within proximity, etc.).
- Use your lost business reports from the convention market to clarify to whom you are consistently losing business; then document what they're doing and you're not.
- Determine your lost visitor market share from State and National data.
- Use a local travel barometer of major travel indicators (air arrivals, interstate traffic, restaurant receipts, visitor center volumes, attractions attendance, etc.) to show business vs. state and national indicators.
Also, don't shy away from communicating marketing challenges and weaknesses in your ongoing communications to stakeholders and business partners; because if you consistently display an "Everything is Rosie" posture of false optimism for the community and CVB, few constituents will then believe in the credibility of your new concerns about additional funding needs.
3. Make sure you have strong community support
Before you launch your Funding Action Plan, make sure you have the strong support of community stakeholders as well as the local votes by the governing body.
We've worked with a variety of communities who had limited confidence in the governing board of the CVB. Others, such as the hotel, arts and sports communities, felt they weren't appropriately represented at the board and executive committee level. The same has been found true by government officials who felt distanced by the CVB and not linked with the DMO through representation of their city manager or Mayor's office. In each case, positive steps were required to address these issues, assure good governance representation and deliver positive support and communications.
(Continued click here.)
|